On March 1, 2023, the Law of the Republic of Belarus "On Combating Corruption" (hereinafter referred to as the Law) came into force with amendments and additions.

On March 1, 2023, the Law of the Republic of Belarus "On Combating Corruption" (hereinafter referred to as the Law) came into force with amendments and additions.

The Law of the Republic of Belarus of 30.12.2022 N 232-Z "On Amendments to Laws on Combating Corruption" introduced a number of amendments and additions to specific articles of the Law. In this article, we will review some of the changes and additions made to the Law.

For example, Article 17 of the Law "Restrictions established for public officials and persons equated to them" has been supplemented with provisions on the need to comply with the procedure for preventing and resolving conflicts of interest;

The Law also prohibits spouses, close relatives, or in-laws from working together in certain positions not only in state bodies but also in organizations with a predominant state ownership share. Previously, the prohibition applied only to working together in state organizations. It also prohibits a public official from using any property of a state body or organization for non-official purposes, not just property obtained while performing official duties. Previously, the prohibition extended only to property transferred for the performance of duties directly assigned to him.

In addition, the Law introduces a new provision establishing the general grounds for the liability of a legal entity for committing corrupt acts in its name or in its interests.

Article 38 of the Law stipulates that if a natural person, on behalf of or in the interests of a legal entity, including a foreign one, has bribed a public official or a person equated to him, or a foreign official, this legal entity shall be liable in accordance with legislative acts.

The current legislation also establishes duties for heads of state bodies and other organizations to prevent and detect violations of anti-corruption legislation, eliminate the consequences of violations, and address the causes and conditions conducive to them. Previously, heads were only responsible for bringing to justice persons who committed violations of anti-corruption legislation and informing state bodies engaged in combating corruption.