Amendments are planned to be introduced in Belarus to Presidential Decree No. 365 "On the Development of Agro-ecotourism". The adjustments are proposed following a public discussion of the activities of entities in this business sector, conducted by the Ministry of Sport and Tourism of the Republic of Belarus in conjunction with state administration bodies and other interested parties.

Amendments are planned to be introduced in Belarus to Presidential Decree No. 365 "On the Development of Agro-ecotourism". The adjustments are proposed following a public discussion of the activities of entities in this business sector, conducted by the Ministry of Sport and Tourism of the Republic of Belarus in conjunction with state administration bodies and other interested parties. What are the main innovations proposed and what is the specific nature of agro-ecotourism development in the Vitebsk region, Svetlana Astanina, Head of the Tourism and Physical Culture and Health Work Sector of the Department of Sport and Tourism of the Regional Executive Committee, told a correspondent of "VV".

– What necessitated the amendments to the decree?

– Initially, in 2006, this document was adopted to support the rural population, develop entrepreneurial initiative in the hinterland, and preserve national Belarusian traditions. Preferential terms for such businesses were provided for in the legislation. However, over time, Decree No. 365 has not always been applied as intended. Exploiting loopholes in the legislation, some enterprising individuals, under the guise of agro-ecotourism estates, began to open hotels and catering establishments, and provide services such as baths and saunas. Complaints about the activities of agro-ecotourism estates from neighbours began to pour in. Villagers said that the owners did not live there but were registered, and rented out accommodation, while guests made noise, set off fireworks, and consumed alcohol. At the same time, the owners of the estates could not be held administratively liable as individuals. They found loopholes in the legislation, limiting themselves to warnings.

– How did the public discussion proceed?