The district prosecutor's office conducted an inspection of compliance with legislation during the enforcement of court decisions and other acts for the recovery of monetary sums in favour of the state and state-owned legal entities, including claims filed by the prosecutor, as well as regarding property confiscation in 2017.
The district prosecutor's office conducted an inspection of compliance with legislation during the enforcement of court decisions and other acts for the recovery of monetary sums in favour of the state and state-owned legal entities, including claims filed by the prosecutor, as well as regarding property confiscation in 2017.
The district prosecutor's office conducted an inspection of compliance with legislation during the enforcement of court decisions and other acts for the recovery of monetary sums in favour of the state and state-owned legal entities, including claims filed by the prosecutor, as well as regarding property confiscation in 2017.
During the inspection, a number of violations of the aforementioned legislation were identified. For instance, bailiffs of the Lepel District Department of Compulsory Enforcement violated the three-day deadline for initiating enforcement proceedings. Violations were also identified concerning the seizure of debtors' pensions, salaries, and equivalent income. Instances of unlawful termination of enforcement proceedings by bailiffs, initiated based on decisions in administrative offence cases due to the debtor's lack of funds and property, were established.
Based on the results of the inspection, a submission was made to the Lepel District Department of Compulsory Enforcement to eliminate violations of legislative requirements in the enforcement of executive documents, as well as the causes and conditions contributing to them. Four protests were filed against bailiffs' decisions to terminate enforcement proceedings initiated based on decisions in administrative offence cases due to the debtor's lack of funds and property. The prosecutor's response measures are under consideration.
A criminal case was heard in an open court session against a resident of Lepel District who intentionally, without valid reasons, evaded conscription for military service.