On January 16 this year, the President of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, held a Security Council meeting dedicated to the consideration of two crucial strategic planning documents – the draft National Security Concept and the Military Doctrine of Belarus.

On January 16 this year, the President of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, held a Security Council meeting, which was dedicated to the consideration of two crucial strategic planning documents – the draft National Security Concept and the Military Doctrine of Belarus.

In the modern history of Belarus, the Military Doctrine has been adopted (refined) three times: in 1992, 2002, and 2016. The provisions of the military doctrines of previous years clearly demonstrate the changes in approaches to forming national military policy. Despite the fact that the document is practically ready for submission to the All-Belarusian People's Assembly for approval, the operation of discussion platforms continues.

We asked the military commissar of Lepel and Ushachi districts, Andrey Pukhalsky, to comment on this issue.
 -  It is no secret that the geopolitical situation around our country, and in the world as a whole, has been characterized by growing tension in recent years. We saw how, during the migration crisis, military tension increased under far-fetched pretexts: troops stationed on the border, the formation of new military units. It is clear that in these conditions, the Republic of Belarus is forced to make changes to the Military Doctrine in order to ensure a clearer response to emerging challenges.
The changes are based on an assessment of the military-political situation around our country. And it has fundamentally changed in recent years. We see that the challenges and threats to Belarus have intensified, and the militarization of the border areas is increasing. And the policy pursued by neighboring states towards Belarus, the Union State, forces us to react and take effective measures.
We state that the Military Doctrine has retained its peace-loving orientation; we do not consider any state as an enemy. But at the same time, the Military Doctrine declares readiness to defend national interests with all forces and means available to the state.”
I understand that the revision of the Military Doctrine causes concern among the population. The updating of the document's provisions is related to making it more consistent with